MP3
Pixies - Where is My Mind?
Support the site and the media
Amazon.ca
The Pixies Stuff
The Dark Knight
Amazon.com
The Dark Knight
The Pixies
iTunes USA (The Pixies)
share on: facebook
Read more!
Sarah Harmer
Amazon.ca
Sarah Harmer Albums
Amazon.com
Buy Sarah Harmer Music
Sarah Harmer MP3s at the MP3 Store
Looking back, the Dreamcast strikes me as an incredible system. Xbox itself and modern consoles have so much in common with what the system offered, it shames me to see its failure.
Why?
· It was the first system to push online gaming
o It was the first console to include a modem in the system
o Voice chat included
o Games like Phantasy Star Online still have people playing over private servers
o They even released a Dreamcast Mouse and Keyboard!
· The Dreamcast supported a VGA Adaptor (which, I use with my HD TV). Meaning games could be displayed with true 640×480 VGA (480p60 EDTV) output
The PS2 had the advantage because it released with DVD technology. In fact, I bought my PS2 before I bought my Dreamcast. DVD was really exciting and that gave PS2 a huge advantage.
What do you think killed the Dreamcast ?
For more info check out
http://www.racketboy.com/retro/2007/02/sega-dreamcast-101-beginners-guide.html


That's right and lossless quality is available . Both Demos and Live Material have been discovered and I'm enjoying sorting through it all, though I'll stick to mainly Neutral Milk Hotel.

"We are writing to you today as many activities are underway to shape/reshape Internet use as you all know it. Over the last year some of you have been made aware and/or have seen activities on throttling in the news or in your daily lives. Another proceeding relating to the Internet in Canada required Telecom providers (Bell/Telus/etc.) to provide ISPs with wholesale service speeds that match those that they offer to their own retail customers.
Specifically, Bell has been directed by the CRTC to provide matching speeds which would allow us all to have more flexibility in our day to day online requirements. Instead of adhering to these directives, Bell decided to take this issue to the federal Cabinet and at the same time file a tariff application with the CRTC proposing to introduce Usage Based Billing (UBB) on its wholesale customer accounts.
What does this mean for you, the consumer?
Bell provides TekSavvy with last mile, wholesale DSL access services, which TekSavvy uses to provide you with your Internet access. If Bell were to be allowed to introduce UBB on this service, a cap of 60GB would be imposed on all of its users, with very heavy penalties per Gigabyte afterwards (multiple times more than our current per Gigabyte rate of $0.25/GB on overages). This would inherently all but remove Unlimited internet services in Ontario/Quebec and potentially cause large increases in internet costs from month to month."
"This issue (the specific Bell vs. CAIP dispute) is not well understood apparently, so let me try to clear this up.
The CRTC, way back, mandated that all the ILECs (Bell, Telus, etc.) must provide access to their ADSL equipment to other ISPs
This mandate specifies that ISPs must connect to the ILEC's backhaul network (this is important), and pay for a certain amount of bandwidth on that backhaul connection. They also pay per customer that connects. When the service is provisioned, a point-to-point link over the backhaul network is established, directly between the ISP and the customer. Note that Internet traffic is never mentioned, and indeed customer's won't even see the ISP's network *at all*. This arrangement could be used by a non-ISP service provider to carry different types of non-TCP/IP traffic, or a VoIP provider not providing Internet access or any other number of arrangements. The point is that the ILEC is not providing an Internet connection, they're providing a point-to-point link only, with a specified service rate.
There are a couple other relevant points here. One is that nowhere in the mandate are monthly traffic caps mentioned, billed for or anything else. The ISP must have sufficient bandwidth at their backhaul POP to carry all their client's traffic, but that's it, and they pay per mbit on this. If a client wants to saturate their DSL line 24/7, Bell shouldn't be able to do anything about it since they're mandated to provide this service, and are only providing backhaul. Further, this hyptothetical saturated DSL connection may not even be carrying Internet traffic, it could be a point-to-point link between a satellite office and large corporate head office or some such.
Once the traffic reaches the ISP's POP, the ISP is then responsible for routing it onto the Internet via their own transit providers. This might be Bell again, but no matter the arrangement, the Internet transit is completely separate from the DSL circuit.
Bell has been throttling their own customers for years now. Only recently have they started throttling their wholesale customers (ISPs). There are a whole bunch of reasons why this is unacceptable. First of all, the fact that they're even touching the traffic it all is a huge concern - they are contracted to provide a simple data link between two locations at a specified bandwidth. The throttling they're imposing is unnecessary (if they're having bandwidth problems on their backhaul, they need to upgrade service or throttle their own customers, period), and it represents opening 3 or more layers of encapsulation to get at their customer's traffic and examine it. And then *modify* the traffic that's being carried on what should be an opaque point-to-point link.
And that's not even getting into how Bell has recently started pushing high-bandwidth services like IPTV and 16mbit service (that their competitors don't have access to). If they can offer these intensive services over their backhaul, why is it necessary to throttle this traffic?
Anyway, this is a messy situation in particular. It's also a good question to ask in general. I believe the Internet is critical infrastructure and needs to be a dumb, opaque pipe to the network. There's far too much room for abuse, unfair treatment of certain protocols or services and on and on. Let's hope the hearing bears that out, or we're in for a long, tough ride."

